Im happy to see eHarmony reacting in their formal weblog to an article titled “Marriage-Maker Claims tend to be Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street Journal. The WSJ article examines many of the relationship stats released by internet dating sites like eHarmony along with the methodology familiar with assess these research. We talked a bit about that subject besides, two weeks ago whenever the initial WSJ article was actually posted (see Story).
The WSJ post didn’t check out kindly regarding the stats introduced by dating sites, and for the most part I agree with the author. People ought to learn exactly how these research are created. Of the many adult dating sites pointed out for the WSJ article, “eHarmony shines as on the list of much more mindful people”. It is not just a glowing report for eHarmony so, they decided to publish a response on their web log.
Into the eHarmony article each goes into additional precisely how they calculated that their own dating site ended up being responsible for 2% of marriages in the usa, from 12-month period stopping March 2007. The vast majority of info we already understood about from a previously circulated PDF docugay local ment called “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics amount of eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), but the post does eliminate a few more details. Just what this web site blog post does program is actually, eHarmony is wanting to get as open and clear employing analysis findings as is possible. I do believe title “Open correspondence” may without a doubt end up being a good solution for formal eHarmony weblog.
Right here is the full eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street diary about how they assess their marriage data. For additional details about this dating site, browse our very own review of eHarmony.